Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process
Journal of Health Sciences and Clinical Practice (JHSCP) implements a strict and structured double-blind peer review process. All submitted manuscripts are reviewed by at least two independent experts, ensuring confidentiality for both authors and reviewers.
1
Initial Editorial Screening

Check relevance to scope, completeness of required components, and similarity level (max. 25% excluding references).

2
Section Editor Evaluation

Manuscripts that pass initial screening are assigned to a Section Editor for further evaluation before forwarding to reviewers.

3
Double-Blind Review

At least two independent experts assess originality, methodology, data quality, analysis, contribution to health sciences, and overall structure. Recommendations: acceptance, minor revision, major revision, or rejection.

4
Revision & Re-review

Authors submit a revised manuscript with a response document. Manuscripts requiring substantial changes may undergo re-review.

5
Final Decision & Publication

Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision. Accepted manuscripts proceed to copyediting, layout, and galley proof. Published 3 times/year (March, July, November). All articles are open access.